About ArgMax
How to Simplify the Tax Code

Hey! Guess what I got in the mail this past week - my 1040 Form! Yea!

1998 is an election year, and as always taxes will be on the agenda of people running for office as well as on the minds of the electorate. One of the most common components contained in most fundamental tax reform proposals is a promise to "simplify" the tax system. Filling out your tax forms can be a pain in the rear and it certainly would be nice to have only a postcard sized tax form to fill out. In Denmark, most people get sent a statement of their tax account which they only have to sign and return - nothing to fill out or calculate.

So, what is it that makes income taxes complicated? Contrary to many of the recent claims by tax reformers, multiple rates do not complicate things in the current system. The "flat tax" - by which I mean creating only one tax bracket - does not by itself simplify anything: only the table which you use to look up your tax would change.

The real effort in filing out your tax form comes from two primary sources: 1) dealing with tax rates that differ by source of income, and 2) dealing with various deductions and exemptions.  To substantially simplify tax returns, we must remove the individuality from tax determination. I have one suggestion to add to the list below.

Individuality

In short, the reason that the tax forms you fill out are complicated is that the IRS needs a good deal of information in order to calculate exactly how much tax you owe.

For example, on the 1997-1040 form you have to list income from wages, interest, dividends, capital gains, alimony, business income, IRA distributions, pensions, rental real estate, farm income, unemployment compensation, social security benefits, and, of course, "other".

On the deductions and credit side you have to list deductions related to IRAs, Medical savings accounts, moving expenses, self employment, health insurance, Keogh plans, alimony paid, early withdrawal of savings, and of course you might have to itemize your deductions for charitable giving or mortgage interest.

To substantially simplify anything, we need to get rid of the preferential treatment of different type of income and the variety of deductions - in short, we need to remove individuality from tax forms.

Proposal for Simplifying the Charity Component

Removing the need to itemize charitable deductions would go a long way in simplifying the tax code. One way to do this is to simply remove the deductibility of charitable giving. "Wait, Wait!" I hear you yelling "Giving is something that should be encouraged!"

Ah-ha! There is a way, however, to keep the current preferential treatment of charitable giving without mucking up tax forms. Rather than giving you a tax deduction, the federal government could instead match the funds as they are contributed to the non-profit organization. The matching rate would give the same amount of preference as the tax deduction. See the table below for an example.
 

Current system: 
 
 
Income: $110
Giving: $10 
 
 
Taxable income: $110 - $10 = $100
 
tax rate: 30%, so tax:  $30
 
income after giving & tax $100 - $30 = $70
  
Bottom line: $10 to charity, $70 left to spend.
My Proposed system: 
 
 
Income: $110
Giving $7 (+ 3$ matching) = 10$
 
Taxable Income $110
 
tax rate: 30%, so tax  $33
 
income after giving & tax $110 - 7$ - $33 = $70
 
Bottom line: $10 to charity, $70 left to spend.  
 
And no Deductions to itemize!
This system would also remove one of the more perverse aspects of the current system -- those at the higher tax brackets are currently rewarded more for giving. By setting a single matching rate this preference would be removed.

Conclusion

You will undoubtedly hear quite a bit in this next election season about simplifying the tax system. It will be important to keep in mind what makes the system complex and to make sure that the proposed simplifications match the present complexities.

The calls that will be made for a flat tax must be evaluated in this light. If the proponents only talk about creating a single rate - and do not address the various deductions and income source differences - they are not talking about simplifying your tax return. The reason for the omission is obvious - people like their deductions - and talking about simplification in the abstract is politically much easier than talking about removing beloved deductions.

And, as a service to all of my kind and generous readers, my proposal for charitable deductions would ease the pain associated with itemized deductions.

See Also:

 
The "Flat Tax" may or may not be more simple.  

Current system 

If a single rate "flat tax" is superimposed on the current system which includes various types of deductions (e.g. IRA's, charity) and preferential treatment of certain kinds of income (like capital gains) there will be no real simplification of the tax code - you would still have to fill out roughly the same form as before. 

The only difference would be in the table in which you look up the amount of tax you owe. 

Simplified system  

There is a case when a flat tax would simplify tax returns. 
If we were to remove all deductions, exemptions, etc., then a single rate tax would allow the IRS to collect the tax directly from businesses, and no real tax filing would be necessary. 

The reason that we need to file taxes is because taxes are very much based on individual or family characteristics. The amount of taxes you owe in the current system depends both upon your earnings as well as other characteristics of your household (such as the earnings of your spouse, charitable giving, number of kids, etc.). 

If we change our system so that no individual information is needed to calculate your tax rate, then taxes can be withheld at the employer level without having to fill out a return in April. The "flat tax" would remove the need for the IRS to know your total income before calculating the correct tax to collect.

 
 
Calculating the Matching Rate for giving. 

Current system 

yd is total income (y) after tax (rate t) and contributions (c). 

yd = y - (y-c)t - c 
yd = y(1-t) - c(1-t) 

Simplified system  

yd' = y(1-t) - c' 

where the ' denotes the new system. 

To equate final incomes under the two systems we get 

yd' = yd 
y(1-t) - c(1-t) = y(1-t) - c' 
or 
c(1-t)=c' 

In order to contribute the same amount to the charity under both systems we must have a matching rate (m) that sets 

c = m*c' 
or 
c = m*c(1-t) 

giving 

m = 1 / (1-t).

 

What is it that makes income taxes complicated? | Posted January 13, 1998 03:12 PM by John Irons

1 Comments

I think i saw it already, do not remember where though.Loan consolidation service

Leave a comment


more entries | rss | about | archives | oldHomePage